|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2817
|
Posted - 2015.06.14 00:59:18 -
[1] - Quote
Manfred Sideous wrote:Kendarr wrote:I see that Manfred Sideous has companioned this change as CSM and now no one likes it he is seriously butt hurt. Confirming. Please someone confirm this confirmation.
I am confirming that Manny confirmed this but not that he was the only one who supported it. That would take a different confirmation.
Yeah, I supported it as well and still do. Yeah the wormhole aspect was discussed and the filthy goon still remembered his roots. No, this is not about killing your specific lifestyle but making people need to be present when playing. At least as far as I am confirmed.
Oh and for the record? Yeah OGB could go tomorrow and I would cheer it on and this from a guy with all the leadership skills done to V.
Be in the game if you be playing the game, yo.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|

Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2821
|
Posted - 2015.06.17 23:33:17 -
[2] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote: The goons have realized that it is easier to "ruin your gameplay" by controlling the CSM rather than trying to herd their cats (members) in-game for the same goal?
heh, good luck with that
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|

Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2821
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 04:14:02 -
[3] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:heh, good luck with that
m Haven't you already been accused multiple times of being one of our secret CSM plants, Mike?
Often accused, never convicted.
I still have to listen to the soundcloud to see what larrikin said. For me it is still not about bombers but players having to play.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|

Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2827
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 21:59:46 -
[4] - Quote
CSM members are still talking to CCP about this.
Some of us are still, here, listening and taking reasonable concerns and suggestions.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|

Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
2831
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 23:27:24 -
[5] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Emo Creeper wrote:Oh god, please tell me most of you guys on the CSM can see why this is a terrible idea. Pretty sure the CSM can't tell you how the CSM feels, only that they're still listening and talking to CCP.
Not true. I can always tell you how I feel. Just not what is said by CCP nor can I hint at ccp discussions by saying things like 'I feel that the AOE omnidamage module for POS shields is a tad overkill' Not that that topic has come up (as far as you know)
This was suggested by someone (I am too lazy to go look) that some eve related media outlet occasionally ask CSM members what they think of threadnaught topics. Of course, some of them will not bother answering pubbies. No point is there?
As for me, to get back to the implied question.
No, I do not see it as a terrible idea but one that needs iteration, consideration, and some tweaking. I stand by the basic idea behind it of not abdicating ships powers to another pilot to do things for you. I could haul out slippery slope arguments or make strawmen but I won't bother. We are far enough along this thread that most of them have been done to death already.
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
|
|
|